Feature Story

"We want to build a future where everyone—regardless of gender, health status, or identity—can live free from stigma and discrimination"

05 June 2025

Ghana’s efforts to end AIDS has long relied on international support, particularly from the United States. Recent US funding cuts, however, have led to the suspension of critical programmes including human rights, raising concerns for key populations most affected by HIV-related stigma and discrimination.

In this interview, Hector Sucilla Perez, UNAIDS Country Director for Ghana, talks about the current state of the HIV response, the consequences of these funding changes, and the next steps for the country’s HIV response. 

Q: What is the current state of Ghana’s HIV epidemic? 

Ghana has an estimated 330 000 people living with HIV, with two-thirds being women aged 15 and over. In 2023 alone, there were 18 000 new infections and 12 000 AIDS-related deaths. The most affected groups are transgender women, men who have sex with men, female sex workers, and women. While new infections and deaths have decreased over the last decade, the reduction is far below expectations—only a 19% drop in new infections and 35% in deaths since 2010. The country needs to speed up more in the way we are decreasing new infections and deaths. 

Ghana’s HIV response is heavily dependent on international donors. In 2022, Ghana's total expenditure on HIV and AIDS-related activities was approximately US$ 126 million. The Global Fund covers about 29% of this, PEPFAR (the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) about 8.5%, and the UN about 4.5%. PEPFAR support in Ghana has been essential and critical, investing more than US$ 204 million since 2007, mainly in HIV prevention, testing, treatment support, monitoring, and human rights work. 

 Q: What specific activities has PEPFAR been supporting in Ghana? 

PEPFAR works in three regions of Ghana, (Western, Western North, and Ahafo), supporting essential catalytic services related to HIV prevention, including PrEP, as well as diagnosis, testing, treatment, and support services. They have also been supporting monitoring and evaluation to strengthen health information systems and improve data accuracy, which is critical for guiding our response. 

Additionally, PEPFAR has been implementing human rights programmes with special emphasis on eliminating HIV-related stigma and discrimination. While they do not procure antiretroviral treatment in Ghana, they provide key technical assistance to the health sector on supply chain management for drugs and commodities.

 Q: What has been the impact of the recent US funding cuts? 

The initial pause in US government support affected activities in more than 120 healthcare sites across two regions, affecting 10 civil society organizations collaborating on PEPFAR-implemented programmes. 

Some critical PEPFAR-supported actions were thereafter reinstated due to the waiver, particularly those related to the 95-95-95 targets, with a focus on vulnerable populations, especially adolescent girls and young women, and pregnant women. Monitoring, evaluation, data collection, and technical support for supply chain management were also reinstated. 

However, strategic activities related to human rights with emphasis on stigma and discrimination, community-led monitoring, and interventions focusing on key populations have been definitively suspended. This represents a significant challenge for Ghana's HIV response. 

Q: How is Ghana responding to these funding cuts, particularly regarding human rights programmes? 

The government, through the Ghana AIDS Commission, has re-established and reinvigorated the Human Rights Stream Committee supported by UNAIDS and the Global Fund Grant. The Committee is currently to analyzing how the country can take over some of these activities. They are looking at integrating HIV more deeply into actions implemented by other government partners such as the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), and increasing collaboration with the Ministry of Gender and Social Protection and the Ministry of Labour. UNAIDS provides technical assistance in support to these efforts. 

We are also supporting CHRAJ to develop a handbook on stigma and discrimination through the lens of HIV, health and rights as a sustainable way of embedding continuous professional development in the work of this Government entity on actions focused to address HIV stigma and discrimination. 

UNAIDS in Ghana is also strengthening community leadership particularly networks of PLHIV and key populations to play an important role in leading harmonized CLM initiatives in Ghana in collaboration with Global Fund implementers. This is by means of technical assistance and hands on support to communities to develop concrete priorities aligned to key data gaps, including stigma and discrimination and linkages to treatment adherence. 

UNAIDS has also engaged with the Global Fund to explore using efficiencies in their grants to cover these activities. The Global Fund has shown willingness to potentially develop a strategy where all stakeholders can contribute to maintaining the most relevant human rights activities in Ghana. 

Q: What new initiatives are being developed to address these gaps? 

The UNAIDS country office is developing an umbrella strategy called the "Ghana for Rights Initiative." We envision this as a national movement aimed at promoting and protecting human rights in Ghana, especially for those most affected by inequality, discrimination, and stigma. 

This initiative goes beyond the regular framework for HIV response, focusing more comprehensively on human rights issues such as gender equality, rights of persons in vulnerable situations, access to healthcare and education, and eradication of HIV-related stigma and discrimination. 

The key components are advocacy, capacity building, and community engagement, with a strong emphasis on community-led monitoring. We are accelerating discussions with country partners, including the government, bilateral donors, communities, and the UN agencies to frame human rights in a different approach and mobilize resources for the country to continue priority work on HIV and human rights intersectional agenda. 

 Q: What are your concerns if human rights programmes remain suspended? 

Without these critical human rights programmes, we risk seeing increased stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV and key populations. This could reverse progress made in encouraging people to get tested and access treatment, ultimately leading to more new infections and AIDS-related deaths. 

The suspension of community-led monitoring also means we lose vital data and feedback from those most affected by HIV, making our response less effective and less targeted to real needs on the ground. This is why we are urgently working to find alternative approaches and funding sources to maintain these essential services. 

 Q: What is your message to the international community? 

Now is not the time to step back from supporting the global HIV response. The progress we have made over the past years—reducing new infections, expanding access to treatment, and fighting stigma—has only been possible because of strong international solidarity and partnership. The recent US funding cuts have significantly impacted Ghana’s HIV programmes , especially those focused on human rights, stigma, and discrimination, which are essential to reaching the most marginalized and people in vulnerable situations . 

We urge donors, development partners, and the global community to continue investing in the global HIV response especially in countries like Ghana, particularly in areas that protect and promote human rights. Without this support, we risk reversing decades of progress and leaving behind those who are most in need. Sustained international commitment is crucial to ensure that Ghana can achieve the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets by 2030 and, ultimately, end AIDS as a public health threat. 

We also invite all partners to join us in innovative approaches, such as the “Ghana for Rights Initiative,” to build a future where everyone—regardless of gender, status, or identity—can live free from stigma, discrimination, and the burden of HIV. 

 

Watch: Disruption not the solution to end AIDS

Region/country

Documents

Global Public Investment campaign launch

29 May 2025

UNAIDS Executive Director remarks - Launch of the campaign for Global Public Investment - Virtual public launch, 29 May 2025
 

Documents

Agenda item 4.2: Interim Financial Management Update

24 June 2025

Documents

Agenda item 4.1: CRP2: Quadrennial Comprehensive Policy Review (QCPR)

24 June 2025

Feature Story

“Who will protect our young people?”

02 June 2025

Noncedo Khumalo grew up in a country with one of the highest HIV prevalence rates in the world, Eswatini—a country landlocked between South Africa and Mozambique.  The 24-year-old has overcome her fair share of difficult times to make ends meet. The recent US funding cuts have now put her future in question.     

“Young girls go for older men because when you finish high school and you want to pursue university, it becomes so hard for us, (economically) so many take a short cut,” she said. 

This was how many of her friends acquired HIV. They had little awareness of HIV or how to protect themselves, she explained. She said that condom use was low and there were many myths about HIV including that it is a curse, only affecting some families. 

Gender-based violence and sexual assault increase the risk of HIV infection. “In some cases, the abuser is a family member who is a bread winner, so women don’t report it,” said Ms Khumalo. 

Dr Nondumiso Ncube, Executive Director of Eswatini’s National Emergency Response Council on HIV/AIDS, says that while the country has managed to consistently reduce new HIV infections, new HIV infections remain stubbornly high amongst the younger population, particularly adolescent girls and young women who are three to five times more likely to be infected than their male counterparts. As a result, Dr Ncube says young women and girls are at the centre of the country’s new HIV strategy.

Ms Khumalo was determined not to be one of these statistics. Every day she walked almost six kilometres to attend school. She got a diploma in social work and became involved with Young Heroes, a local community organization, supported by the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) three years ago.  

Through this initiative, Ms Khumalo provided peer counselling to adolescents and young women about how to prevent HIV and about broader sexual and reproductive health. She visited schools and communities, offering information and support to help young people protect themselves against HIV. 

Around 60% of Eswatini’s HIV response was funded by PEPFAR, however, in January the US cut all funding for HIV and issued a stop-work order for Young Heroes, forcing them to scale back their services. Ms. Khumalo lost her job. 

Now unemployed and unable to reach the vulnerable young people she once served, Ms Khumalo fears for the safety of young women and girls in her community, where transactional sex between older men and young women, often motivated by poverty, and sexual and gender-based violence remain widespread. “I’m scared for the future of young people,” she said. “Without these HIV programmes, who will protect them?” 

Nosipho Sacolo, a young woman living near the capital city of Mbabane expressed her fears.  “After managing to stay free from HIV for so many years, we no longer have the services to protect us.”  

UNAIDS Country Director for Eswatini, Nuha Ceesay says HIV prevention services—many of which are now closed—have been a game changer in Eswatini. 

“Eswatini has made huge progress in preventing new HIV infections, with new infections falling by 73% since 2010,” he said.

The country still has some challenges, according to him. More than 1300 young women and adolescent girls are infected every year. And nearly twice the number of women are living with HIV compared to men.

UNAIDS and partners are concerned that the abrupt halt to PEPFAR supported HIV prevention programmes could reverse the gains that have been made. 

A local network of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working to ensure access to primary health care for people in Eswatini—including populations at high risk of HIV infection—CANGO, says the PEPFAR pause could have dire consequences for the country's HIV response, including a rise in new infections among young women and girls. "85 000 people were benefiting from the support, (now) all the people who were working in the sector, who were supporting our people living with HIV, are now sitting at home," said CANGO Executive Director, Thembinkosi Dlamini.

With PEPFAR’s support Eswatini had managed to ensure 93% of people living with HIV were on lifesaving antiretroviral treatment. This is one of Principal Secretary of the Ministry of Health, Khanyakwezwe Mabuza’s main concerns. “Treatment is not something you can skip,” he said. “We have to make sure that people continue to get their life-saving treatment.”

Meanwhile, Ms Khumalo is still hoping that the government and partners will not abandon the peer outreach workshops. Her livelihood and countless others depends on it as do the people they are helping to stay free from HIV.

Watch: Aid cuts hurt HIV response in Eswatini: UNAIDS fears rebound

Region/country

Documents

The cost of inaction: The cost of not realizing the sexual and reproductive health and rights (including HIV) of young people in Zimbabwe and South Africa

02 June 2025

UNAIDS uses ‘cost of inaction’ as an indicator of the negative impact on the lives of people and communities of not investing resources to end AIDS. This issue is particularly significant with regard to the provision of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and HIV services for young people in eastern and southern Africa.

The cost of inaction for young people is especially significant as the impact extends through most of their life. This report explores the costs of inaction in not realising the SRHR needs of young people in South Africa and Zimbabwe, focusing on costs related to: 1) adolescent pregnancies, 2) HIV acquisition and 3) gender-based violation.

Using a cost of inaction approach, this report calculates the current cost of the inadequate provision of SRHR and HIV services to young people aged 15–24 years old in the two countries. This provides a foundation for alternative policies to be costed to address these gaps and a true cost–benefit analysis to be conducted.

Read more

Documents

Agenda item 8: Statement by the representative of the USSA

24 June 2025

Subscribe to